z-logo
Premium
A randomized, controlled clinical trial of an intravesical pressure‐attenuation balloon system for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in females
Author(s) -
Wyndaele JeanJacques,
De Wachter Stefan,
Tommaselli Giovanni A.,
Angioli Roberto,
de Wildt Michel J.,
Everaert Karel C. M.,
Michielsen Dirk P.J.,
Van Koeveringe Gommert A.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
neurourology and urodynamics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.918
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1520-6777
pISSN - 0733-2467
DOI - 10.1002/nau.22708
Subject(s) - medicine , urinary incontinence , tolerability , balloon , randomized controlled trial , clinical endpoint , dysuria , urology , surgery , adverse effect , urinary system
Aims Evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a novel pressure‐attenuation balloon for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) using a prospective, randomized, single‐blind, multi‐center design, evaluated at 3 months. Methods Sixty‐three females with SUI were randomized 2:1 to treatment with a balloon (N = 41) or sham procedure (N = 22). The sham (control) entailed the same procedure without the deployment of a balloon. Endpoints were evaluated at 3 months and included a composite endpoint that required both ≥10 point increase in the 22‐item Incontinence Quality of Life Survey (I‐QOL) and ≥50% decrease in provocative pad weight. Additional endpoints included incontinence episode frequency, and PGII assessment. Results In an ITT analysis, 63% of women in the treatment group achieved the composite endpoint, compared to 31% in the Control Group ( P  = 0.0200). In a per protocol analysis, 81% of women in the treatment arm had a 50% decrease in pad weight test vs. 45% in the Control Group ( P  = 0.0143); 41.6% of the treatment patients were dry on pad weight test (≤1gram) vs. 0% in the Control Group ( P  < 0.001), and 58% of treated patients reported improvement on a PGII assessment versus 25% of women in the Control Group ( P  = 0.025). Adverse events in the treatment group included dysuria (14.6%), gross hematuria (9.8%), and UTI (7.3%). Conclusions This minimally invasive treatment for female SUI with an intravesical pressure‐attenuation balloon was safe and effective. The concept of pressure attenuation as a therapy for SUI is valid and feasible for those patients that can tolerate the balloon. Neurourol. Urodynam. 35:252–259, 2016 . © 2015 The Authors. Neurourology & Urodynamics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom