Premium
Women urinate in the standing position do not increase post‐void residual urine volumes
Author(s) -
Chou Eric ChiehLung,
Chang ChaoHsiang,
Chen ChiCheng,
Wu HsiChin,
Wu PoLun,
Chen KuoLiang
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
neurourology and urodynamics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.918
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1520-6777
pISSN - 0733-2467
DOI - 10.1002/nau.20868
Subject(s) - sitting , medicine , urination , residual volume , urine , residual , urology , physical therapy , anatomy , urinary system , mathematics , lung volumes , pathology , algorithm , lung
Aims The effects of standing while voiding have seldom been investigated in women. We evaluate urodynamic parameters of voiding while standing in healthy women using uroflowmetry and post‐void residual urine volume assessment. Results are compared with crouching and sitting. Methods Between July and October, 2008, a total of 30 healthy, nulliparous female volunteers were enrolled. Ages were 22–37 (mean: 28±4). Urodynamic studies were performed for all in sitting, crouching and standing positions; 3, 3 and 5 times in each position, respectively. Volunteers used homemade auxiliary appliances for collecting urine from the urethra and draining it forward when standing. Volume, maximum flow rate, mean flow rate and post‐void residual urine volume were compared. Results Maximum and average flow rates in the sitting and standing positions were significantly different, but not between sitting and crouching or between crouching and standing. There were no differences in voided volume and post‐void residual urine volume. There's no apparent learning curve for women in the standing position. Conclusions Though flow rates are decreased while standing, post‐void residual volume is not significantly different. Women have another choice for voiding in public restrooms. Neurourol. Urodynam. 29:1299–1300, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.