Premium
Electromotive drug‐administration: A pilot study for minimal‐invasive treatment of therapy‐resistant idiopathic detrusor overactivity
Author(s) -
Bach Peter,
Wormland Renate T.,
Möhring Cornelia,
Goepel Mark
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
neurourology and urodynamics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.918
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1520-6777
pISSN - 0733-2467
DOI - 10.1002/nau.20624
Subject(s) - medicine , urination , anticholinergic , urology , nocturia , anesthesia , lidocaine , urinary incontinence , urinary system
Electromotive drug‐administration (EMDA) represents a minimal‐invasive method of intravesical instillation of therapeutic agents. We examined the therapeutic effect of EMDA in patients suffering from therapy‐resistant idiopathic detrusor overactivity (IDO) with respect to urodynamics, micturition charts and quality of life (Kings Health Questionnaire). Methods Patients suffering from urge syndrome with and without urge incontinence and non‐responding to oral anticholinergic drugs underwent EMDA therapy (2000 mg lidocaine‐HCl 4% (50 ml), 2 mg epinephrine [1:1000] (2 ml), 40 mg dexamethason‐21‐dihydrogen phosphat (10 ml) in a total volume of 100 ml). Over a 27 months period, 84 patients (median age 63.1 years; 72 female, 12 male) with urge syndrome and urodynamically‐proven idiopathic detrusor overactivity (IDO) were treated with EMDA. Following urodynamic measurements, quality of life (QoL) was evaluated using Kings Health Questionnaire (KHQ) and a micturition chart over 48 h, EMDA was performed once in four weeks for a period of three months. Patients continued to document drinking and micturition data during this time. Before each EMDA session urodynamic examination and KHQ were repeated. Results All treated patients suffered from urge syndrome (25.6% OAB wet, 20.0% OAB dry and 54.4% mixed urinary incontinence). Mean daytime frequency (DF) was 14.1 ± 7.7 per day and nocturia (N) 5.1 ± 5.1 per night before EMDA. After two EMDA sessions, daytime frequency (DF) decreased to 9.4 ± 6.2 per day ( P < 0.0001) and 2.5 ± 2.4 per night ( P = 0.035). The use of pads could be lowered from 4.5 ± 4.1 per 24 h to 1.8 ± 2.4 ( P < 0.0074). The first desire to void volume (FDV) assessed by urodynamics started at 94.0 ± 60.5 ml before treatment and changed to 142.2 ± 79.6 ml ( P = 0.0064) after two sessions. Strong desire to void volume (SDV) was noticed at 155.6 ± 84.8 ml filling of the bladder; after two EMDA sessions at 199.5 ± 97.3 ml ( P = 0.001). Uninhibited detrusor contractions (UIC) were seen in all patients before treatment and were reduced to 46.4% after two EMDA sessions ( P < 0.001). Maximal cystometric bladder capacity (MCBC) increased from 192.3 ± 106.6 ml to 239.6 ± 114.9 ml ( P = 0.018). Patient‐documented bladder capacity (BC) as micturition volume increased from 186.0 ± 108.7 ml to 234.2 ± 134.2 ml ( P = 0.043). A reduction of impact of Quality of Life (QoL) was observed from 11.8 ± 0.4 to 7.0 ± 0.3 ( P < 0.001) during treatment. A fraction of 53.6% (45/84) of all patients reported a completely withdrawal of symptoms and 28.6% (24/84) indicated a remarkable reduction. Only 10.7% (9/84) of patients did not continue therapy after two sessions. Conclusion EMDA significantly improves urodynamic parameters, QoL and pad usages in patients with urge syndrome and therapy‐resistant IDO. Therefore we offer EMDA therapy as an alternative treatment modality to the standard approaches. Neurourol. Urodynam. 28:209–213, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.