Premium
Variation in urological practice amongst spinal injuries units in the UK and Eire
Author(s) -
Bycroft John,
Hamid Rizwan,
Bywater Helen,
Patki Prasad,
Craggs Michael,
Shah Julian
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
neurourology and urodynamics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.918
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1520-6777
pISSN - 0733-2467
DOI - 10.1002/nau.20005
Subject(s) - medicine , asymptomatic , urinary system , upper urinary tract , urologic disease , general surgery , surgery
Aims To investigate variations in common urological practice between the Spinal Injuries Units (SIU) of UK and Eire. Methods In December 2002, each of the 12 SIU in the UK and Eire were sent a questionnaire addressing basic practice relating to urological outpatient follow‐up, management of urinary tract infection, upper tract surveillance, and urodynamic studies. Results Regarding frequency of urological review, two units only saw patients when specifically required. One unit reviewed patients every 6 months and six centres reviewed patients annually. The remaining three units had a patient‐specific follow‐up protocol. Regarding urinary tract infection, only five units had a unified departmental management protocol. Four units advocated antibiotic prophylaxis for recurrent UTI. Only one unit would routinely treat asymptomatic UTI in individuals using catheters. The range of recommended duration of treatment for symptomatic UTI was 3–14 days (mean 6.3). All units performed routine upper tract screening, ranging from annually to every 3 years. Six units did not perform routine urodynamic studies; in other units the range of frequency of urodynamics was from annually to every 3 years. Conclusions The variation in urological practice amongst SIU in the UK and Eire is considerable. This finding supports the need for an increase in the level of collaboration and research. Neurourol. Urodynam. 23:252–256, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.