Premium
Validation of the clinical bulbocavernosus reflex
Author(s) -
Wester C.,
FitzGerald M.P.,
Brubaker L.,
Welgoss J.,
Benson J.T.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
neurourology and urodynamics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.918
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1520-6777
pISSN - 0733-2467
DOI - 10.1002/nau.10140
Subject(s) - bulbocavernosus reflex , medicine , reflex , external anal sphincter , electromyography , urology , anesthesia , physical medicine and rehabilitation , surgery , anal canal , rectum
Aims To validate the clinically obtained bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR) by comparing it to the results of clitoroanal reflex (CAR) electrodiagnostic testing. Materials and Methods Thirty three women with detrusor overactivity underwent clinical examination and electrodiagnostic testing including evaluation of CAR latency using a Nicolet Viking IIe electrodiagnostic instrument, stimulating the paraclitoral area on each side in turn with paired stimuli while recording anal sphincter compound muscle action potentials bilaterally using surface patch electrodes. The results of clinical and electrodiagnostic testing were compared. Results The BCR was clinically present on at least one side in 26 (79%) women, and thought to be clinically bilaterally absent in 7 (21%). Electrophysiologic testing revealed CARs to be at least unilaterally present in 30 (91%) patients. When the BCR was clinically present, a CAR was recorded in 92% of patients. Of the seven women with clinically absent BCR, just one had absent CARs. Conclusions In this sample of women with detrusor overactivity, the clinical BCR did not have strong correlation with the electrically obtained reflex. Neurourol. Urodynam. 22:589–592, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.