z-logo
Premium
A comparison of variational formats for porous media subjected to dynamic loading
Author(s) -
Lenhof B.,
Larsson F.,
Runesson K.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
international journal for numerical and analytical methods in geomechanics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.419
H-Index - 91
eISSN - 1096-9853
pISSN - 0363-9061
DOI - 10.1002/nag.925
Subject(s) - porous medium , acceleration , permeability (electromagnetism) , porosity , range (aeronautics) , field (mathematics) , added mass , geotechnical engineering , mechanics , mathematics , engineering , materials science , physics , chemistry , classical mechanics , composite material , pure mathematics , biochemistry , vibration , quantum mechanics , membrane
This paper presents a comparison of two variational formats for fully saturated porous media subjected to dynamic loading, whereby the general situation of relative fluid acceleration is considered: (1) the classical three‐field ( u , p , w )‐format and (2) a novel two‐field ( u , p )‐format, where the seepage velocity w is a spatially ‘local’ field whose treatment resembles that of internal variables in material models. The limited numerical comparison shows that the ( u , p )‐format competes well with the ( u , p , w )‐format. Indeed, it is consistent with the general acceleration modeling in the full range of permeabilities. Moreover, in the low permeability regime (where the magnitude of w is insignificant), the new format reflects the situation pertinent to ‘added‐mass’ and is more efficient than the classical ( u , p , w )‐format. Finally, the ( u , p )‐formatcan conveniently be implemented in existing FE‐codes based on the ‘added mass’ formulation. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom