Premium
Comparison of calculational approaches for structural deformation in jointed rock
Author(s) -
Senseny Paul E.,
Simons Donald A.
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
international journal for numerical and analytical methods in geomechanics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.419
H-Index - 91
eISSN - 1096-9853
pISSN - 0363-9061
DOI - 10.1002/nag.1610180504
Subject(s) - structural engineering , finite element method , discontinuous deformation analysis , discrete element method , joint (building) , code (set theory) , slip (aerodynamics) , deformation (meteorology) , engineering , closure (psychology) , computer science , geology , set (abstract data type) , mechanics , physics , oceanography , economics , market economy , programming language , aerospace engineering
Results from five different computer models for structural deformation in jointed rock are compared for a problem involving stress‐wave loading of a lined circular tunnel in a jointed medium. The computer models include two discrete element codes, The Direct Interacting Block Systems (DIBS) and The Universal Distinct Element Code (UDEC), and three finite element codes, The Finite Element Code for Largely Explicit Calculation (FLEX), The Explicit Calculations of Interacting Bodies Under Rapid Loading Code (EXCALIBUR), and PRONTO. The finite element codes used either slidelines or joint elements to simulate the motion on joints. All codes had some difficulties with a sequence of preliminary problems solved to ‘shake down’ the computer codes. However, most of the shortcomings of each code were readily overcome. Results showed that three codes could obtain similar answers for tunnel closure, stress around the tunnel and slip on the joints.