Premium
Movements and Macrohabitat Use of Alligator Gar in Relation to a Low Head Lock and Dam System
Author(s) -
Lochmann Steve,
Brinkman Eric L.,
Hann Dylan A.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
north american journal of fisheries management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.587
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1548-8675
pISSN - 0275-5947
DOI - 10.1002/nafm.10554
Subject(s) - alligator , habitat , american alligator , fishery , spring (device) , home range , ecology , geography , biology , mechanical engineering , engineering
Loss of habitat, targeted removals, and overharvest has contributed to the decline of Alligator Gar Atractosteus spatula . There is agreement among commercial fishers, some recreational anglers, conservationists, and natural resource managers that this species warrants conservation. Appropriate management actions require research to further understand the life history and ecology of Alligator Gar populations. We conducted a movement study of 16 Alligator Gar in the lower Ouachita River, Arkansas–Louisiana, for 1 year using acoustic telemetry. The Alligator Gar were stationary at least 28% of the year. We documented 1,552 movement events during the study. The mean (SD) movement rate during the movement events was 1.13 (0.18) km/h, but it varied among individuals. Only 2 of the 16 Alligator Gar were detected upstream of Felsenthal Dam. The tailwater habitat just below Felsenthal Dam was used heavily by the Alligator Gar. The linear home range was 11.9 (7.1) river kilometers. Due to the hydrology of the system, access to the floodplain is not a hindrance to the lateral movement of Alligator Gar in the Ouachita River. The Felsenthal Dam did seem to hinder longitudinal movement, even though high water allowed the fish to move over and around the dam during spring and early summer. Management plans to rebuild Alligator Gar populations in regulated river systems should consider the negative consequences of barriers to lateral or longitudinal movement.