Premium
Targeting Aggregations of Telemetered Lake Trout to Increase Gillnetting Suppression Efficacy
Author(s) -
Williams Jacob R.,
Guy Christopher S.,
Koel Todd M.,
Bigelow Patricia E.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
north american journal of fisheries management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.587
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1548-8675
pISSN - 0275-5947
DOI - 10.1002/nafm.10401
Subject(s) - trout , salvelinus , fishery , oncorhynchus , telemetry , environmental science , fish <actinopterygii> , biology , engineering , aerospace engineering
Conserving Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout Oncorhynchus clarkii bouvieri by suppressing invasive Lake Trout Salvelinus namaycush in Yellowstone Lake is a high priority for Yellowstone National Park resource managers. Here, we tested whether targeting telemetered Lake Trout could increase the efficacy of Lake Trout suppression by gill netting. Mobile acoustic tracking surveys were performed to identify aggregations of tagged Lake Trout in summer (June–August) 2017. Lake Trout aggregations were relayed daily to suppression crews by phone, radio, or text and a printed map. Suppression crews set 30 large‐mesh gill nets targeting telemetered Lake Trout aggregations (target treatment) and 124 large‐mesh gill nets not targeting telemetered aggregations (nontarget treatment). Mean log e (CPUE) was higher for the target treatment (0.37; 95% credible interval [CRI] = 0.08–0.65) than for the nontarget treatment (−0.37; 95% CRI = −0.51 to −0.21). Mean of the target treatment was higher than the mean of the nontarget treatment for over 99% of the 1,000 draws from the joint posterior distribution. Because of telemetry costs, mean CPUE per US$10,000 spent was similar between the target treatment (0.20; 95% CRI = 0.15–0.26) and the nontarget treatment (0.15; 95% CRI = 0.13–0.17). Telemetry is an effective strategy for improving Lake Trout CPUE, which corresponds to an increased efficiency in the Lake Trout suppression program.