Premium
Predicted and Observed Responses of a Nonnative Channel Catfish Population Following Managed Removal to Aid the Recovery of Endangered Fishes
Author(s) -
Pennock Casey A.,
Durst Scott L.,
Duran Bobby R.,
Hines Brian A.,
Cathcart C. Nathan,
Davis Jason E.,
Schleicher Benjamin J.,
Franssen Nathan R.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
north american journal of fisheries management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.587
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1548-8675
pISSN - 0275-5947
DOI - 10.1002/nafm.10056
Subject(s) - electrofishing , overfishing , fishery , catfish , ictalurus , endangered species , population , fishing , biology , ecology , environmental science , abundance (ecology) , habitat , fish <actinopterygii> , demography , sociology
Human transformation of aquatic systems and the introduction of nonnative species increasingly threaten the persistence of imperiled freshwater fishes. In response, large‐scale mechanical removal of nonnative fishes has been implemented throughout parts of the Colorado River basin to aid recovery of endangered fishes, but the effects of these efforts can be difficult to quantify. Fisheries population models for predicting outcomes of harvest regulations have been widely used to prevent overfishing of commercial and game stocks. Here, we used population models to investigate size‐specific removal efforts needed to overfish a nonnative population of Channel Catfish Ictalurus punctatus and thereby aid recovery of endangered fishes in the San Juan River, New Mexico and Utah. The minimum size of fish that were efficiently captured with electrofishing gear was 280 mm TL , and annual removal rates increased with fish size, ranging from 0.10 for 200‐mm fish to 0.44 for 600‐mm fish. Model results suggested that removal rates should be increased from 0.14 to a range of 0.21–0.34 to cause growth overfishing and should be increased to a range of 0.26–0.29 to cause recruitment overfishing at a minimum electrofishing size limit of 280 mm TL . However, model results indicated that overall population abundance and biomass are being substantially reduced compared to an unmanaged population. In concordance, long‐term monitoring data from 1991 to 2015 demonstrated a decrease in Channel Catfish TL and mass as well as an increase in catch rate variability since removal efforts intensified in 2006. Overall, current rates of removal will probably not achieve collapse of the nonnative Channel Catfish population in the San Juan River, but the reduction in size structure indicates that the population has responded to these efforts.