z-logo
Premium
Extensor digitorum brevis reflex in normals and patients with radiculopathies
Author(s) -
Dillingham Timothy R.,
Marin Raul,
Belandres Praxedes V.,
Chang Audrey
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
muscle and nerve
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.025
H-Index - 145
eISSN - 1097-4598
pISSN - 0148-639X
DOI - 10.1002/mus.880180108
Subject(s) - reflex , h reflex , medicine , population , anatomy , anesthesia , environmental health
This prospective study evaluated the extensor digitorum brevis deep tendon reflex (EDBR) in a normal population and in patients with L‐5 and S‐1 radiculopathies. There were 88 subjects: 53 normals, 17 L‐5, and 18 S‐1 radiculopathy subjects. The clinical EDBR revealed a 91% specificity, with 18% sensitivity for L‐5, and 11% for S‐1. The electrodiagnostic EDBR yielded increased sensitivities of 35% for L‐5 ( P = 0.07) and 39% for S‐1 ( P = 0.04), with 87% specificity. H‐reflexes showed 50% sensitivity for the S‐1 group ( P = 0.0006) and 91% specificity. EDBR latencies were significantly related to age and leg length ( r 2 = 0.46, P < 0.0001). Age alone explained 26% ( P < 0.0001) of the EDBR variability and leg length 20% ( P < 0.0001). EDBR clinical and electrodiagnostic reflexes have low sensitivities, high specificities, and do not discriminate L‐5 from S‐1 root involvement.© 1995 John Wiley &Sons, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom