z-logo
Premium
There are no neurophysiologic features characteristic of “axonal” Guillain–Barré syndrome
Author(s) -
Cros Didier,
Triggs William J.
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
muscle and nerve
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.025
H-Index - 145
eISSN - 1097-4598
pISSN - 0148-639X
DOI - 10.1002/mus.880170617
Subject(s) - guillain barre syndrome , neuroscience , medicine , physical medicine and rehabilitation , psychology , pediatrics
Classical views hold Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) as a primary inflammatory‐demyelinating neuropathy in which secondary axonal degeneration may occur, particularly when inflammatory lesions are severe. Feasby and colleagues proposed that primary axonal degeneration can also cause GBS characterized by inexcitable motor nerves and poor outcome. This hypothesis rests largely on the results of a single autopsy in which no inflammation or demyelination were found. Using an illustrative case report confirming earlier studies, we point out that inexcitable motor nerves (or low amplitude compound muscle action potentials [CMAPs]) are of ambiguous significance and may reflect distal demyelination, causing conduction block between distal stimulation sites and target muscles, a pattern not uncommon in GBS. Recovery from such lesions may occur within weeks with restoration of CMAP amplitudes. The recognition of a yet unproven axonal variant of GBS cannot be based solely on documentation of inexcitable motor nerves in the context of rapidly developing weakness. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here