Premium
Surface electrical stimulation for facial paralysis is not harmful
Author(s) -
Puls Wiebke C.,
Jarvis Jonathan C.,
Ruck Anne,
Lehmann Thomas,
GuntinasLichius Orlando,
Volk Gerd Fabian
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
muscle and nerve
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.025
H-Index - 145
eISSN - 1097-4598
pISSN - 0148-639X
DOI - 10.1002/mus.26784
Subject(s) - synkinesis , reinnervation , medicine , interquartile range , facial paralysis , facial nerve , paralysis , anesthesia , facial muscles , stimulation , surgery , denervation , anatomy , palsy , alternative medicine , pathology
Does electrical stimulation (ES) of denervated muscles delay or prevent reinnervation, or increase synkinesis? In this retrospective study we evaluate the outcome, with and without ES, of patients with acutely denervated facial muscles. Methods The effect of ES was analyzed in two experiments. In the first experiment, 39 patients (6 with home‐based ES, median 17.5 months) underwent facial nerve reconstruction surgery. Time to recovery of volitional movements was analyzed. The second experiment involved 13 patients (7 with ES, median 19 months) during spontaneous reinnervation. Sunnybrook and eFACE scores provided functional outcome measures. Results No difference in time of reinnervation after facial nerve reconstruction surgery was seen between the patients with and without ES (median [interquartile range]: 4.5 [3.0‐5.25] vs 5.7 [3.5‐9.5] months; P = .2). After spontaneous reinnervation, less synkinesis was noted (Sunnybrook synkinesis score: 3.0 [2.0–3.0] vs 5.5 [4.75‐7.0]; P = .02) with ES. Discussion We find no evidence that ES prevents or delays reinnervation or increases synkinesis in facial paralysis.