z-logo
Premium
Prophylactic stretching does not reduce cramp susceptibility
Author(s) -
Miller Kevin C.,
Harsen James D.,
Long Blaine C.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
muscle and nerve
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.025
H-Index - 145
eISSN - 1097-4598
pISSN - 0148-639X
DOI - 10.1002/mus.25762
Subject(s) - medicine , physical medicine and rehabilitation , muscle cramp
: Some clinicians advocate stretching to prevent muscle cramps. It is unknown whether static or proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching increases cramp threshold frequency (TF c ), a quantitative measure of cramp susceptibility. Methods: Fifteen individuals completed this randomized, counterbalanced, cross‐over study. We measured passive hallux range of motion (ROM) and then performed 3 minutes of either static stretching, PNF stretching (hold–relax—with agonist contraction), or no stretching. ROM was reassessed and TF c was measured. Results: PNF stretching increased hallux extension (pre‐PNF 81 ± 11°, post‐PNF 90 ± 10°; P < 0.05) but not hallux flexion (pre‐PNF 40 ± 7°, post‐PNF 40 ± 7°; P > 0.05). Static stretching increased hallux extension (pre‐static 80 ± 11°, post‐static 88 ± 9°; P < 0.05) but not hallux flexion (pre‐static 38 ± 9°, post‐static 39 ± 8°; P > 0.05). No ROM changes occurred with no stretching ( P > 0.05). TF c was unaffected by stretching (no stretching 18 ± 7 H z , PNF 16 ± 4 H z , static 16 ± 5 H z ; P = 0.37). Discussion: Static and PNF stretching increased hallux extension, but neither increased TF c . Acute stretching may not prevent muscle cramping. Muscle Nerve 57 : 473–477, 2018

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom