Premium
Factors contributing to delay in diagnosis of Guillain‐Barré syndrome and impact on clinical outcome
Author(s) -
Dubey Divyanshu,
Kapotic Marissa,
Freeman Matthew,
Sawhney Anshudha,
Rojas Julio C.,
Warnack Worthy,
Vernino Steven
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
muscle and nerve
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.025
H-Index - 145
eISSN - 1097-4598
pISSN - 0148-639X
DOI - 10.1002/mus.24772
Subject(s) - medicine , guillain barre syndrome , neurology , weakness , retrospective cohort study , pediatrics , emergency department , medical diagnosis , observational study , intubation , emergency medicine , anesthesia , surgery , psychiatry , pathology
Heterogeneity of presenting symptoms makes the initial clinical diagnosis of Guillain‐Barré syndrome (GBS) challenging. Methods Observational retrospective study from 2 teaching hospitals (Parkland Memorial Hospital and University of Texas Southwestern University Hospital) between 2008 and 2013. Results Sixty‐nine GBS patients were identified. GBS was suspected on initial emergency department visit in only 49%. During first hospital encounter, 58% were evaluated by a neurologist. Neuropathic pain and presence of intact deep tendon reflexes were associated with delayed GBS diagnosis ( P < 0.05). There was significantly better clinical outcome among patients who were evaluated by a neurologist during the initial visit ( P < 0.005). Among these patients there was also significant difference in discharge destination; 71.2% of patients evaluated by a neurologist were discharged home ( P < 0.01). Patients in whom GBS was not suspected at the time of initial Neurology evaluation were more likely to require intubation and to have residual weakness at the time of discharge ( P < 0.05). Conclusions Atypical clinical signs and symptoms may lead to delayed diagnosis of GBS. Early neurological evaluation is associated with improved clinical diagnosis and discharge disposition. Muscle Nerve 53: 384–387, 2016