z-logo
Premium
Assessment of quadriceps muscle inactivation with a new electrical stimulation paradigm
Author(s) -
Wellauer Vanessa,
Morf Claudia,
Minetto Marco A.,
Place Nicolas,
Maffiuletti Nicola A.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
muscle and nerve
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.025
H-Index - 145
eISSN - 1097-4598
pISSN - 0148-639X
DOI - 10.1002/mus.24266
Subject(s) - stimulation , quadriceps muscle , contraction (grammar) , femoral nerve , muscle contraction , torque , physical medicine and rehabilitation , chemistry , medicine , anesthesia , physics , thermodynamics
: In this study we evaluated the validity of garment‐based quadriceps stimulation (GQS) for assessment of muscle inactivation in comparison with femoral nerve stimulation (FNS). Methods : Inactivation estimates (superimposed doublet torque), self‐reported discomfort, and twitch and doublet contractile properties were compared between GQS and FNS in 15 healthy subjects. Results : Superimposed doublet torque was significantly lower for GQS than for FNS at 20% and 40% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) ( P < 0.01), but not at 60%, 80%, and 100% MVC. Discomfort scores were systematically lower for GQS than for FNS ( P < 0.05). Resting twitch and doublet peak torque were lower for GQS, and time to peak torque was shorter for GQS than for FNS ( P < 0.01). Conclusions : GQS can be used with confidence for straightforward evaluation of quadriceps muscle inactivation, whereas its validity for assessment of contractile properties remains to be determined. Muscle Nerve 51 : 117–124, 2015

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom