Premium
Safety of repetitive nerve stimulation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
Author(s) -
Cronin Edmond M.,
Gray Jennifer,
AbiSaleh Bernard,
Wilkoff Bruce L.,
Levin Kerry H.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
muscle and nerve
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.025
H-Index - 145
eISSN - 1097-4598
pISSN - 0148-639X
DOI - 10.1002/mus.23707
Subject(s) - medicine , repetitive nerve stimulation , emi , nerve conduction , electromagnetic interference , stimulation , nerve stimulator , cardiology , anesthesia , electrical engineering , engineering , myasthenia gravis
Pacemakers and implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators (ICDs) are vulnerable to inappropriate sensing of electromagnetic interference (EMI), such as from nerve conduction studies. We conducted a prospective study to assess the safety of repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS). Methods: Fourteen patients undergoing insertion of 10 ICDs and 4 pacemakers under general anesthesia received RNS of the median, axillary, and spinal accessory nerves at 2 H Z and 50 H Z . We recorded detection of EMI and whether or not this resulted in an arrhythmia diagnosis or change in pacing output. Results: EMI was visible in 2 ICDs, without spurious tachyarrhythmia detection. EMI was observed in 3 of the 4 pacemakers, which led to pacing inhibition and a pause in 2, both of which were programmed to a unipolar sensing configuration. Conclusions: RNS is safe in patients with ICDs. In pacemaker patients, RNS appears safe during bipolar sensing, but caution is recommended in pacemaker patients with unipolar sensing. Muscle Nerve 47: 840–844, 2013