z-logo
Premium
Validity and reliability of nerve and muscle ultrasound
Author(s) -
Cartwright Michael S.,
Demar Samantha,
Griffin Leah P.,
Balakrishnan Nikhil,
Harris Jessica M.,
Walker Francis O.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
muscle and nerve
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.025
H-Index - 145
eISSN - 1097-4598
pISSN - 0148-639X
DOI - 10.1002/mus.23621
Subject(s) - intra rater reliability , ultrasound , reliability (semiconductor) , inter rater reliability , medicine , anatomy , cadaver , median nerve , nuclear medicine , radiology , mathematics , rating scale , statistics , confidence interval , physics , power (physics) , quantum mechanics
: Nerve and muscle ultrasound has been studied in several conditions, but validity and reliability have not been assessed systematically. Methods : Nerve cross‐sectional area and muscle thickness were measured ultrasonographically at several sites in 4 cadavers, which were then dissected, and actual measurements were obtained. To assess intrarater and interrater reliability, between 3 and 5 ultrasonographers, with varying experience levels, made repeated measurements on healthy volunteers. Results : Correlation coefficients for nerve and muscle validity were >0.968 ( P < 0.001), and for intrarater reliability were >0.901 ( P < 0.001) for still and real‐time images. Correlation coefficients for interrater reliability were more varied, but for still images they were all significant at the P < 0.001 (0.542–0.998) level, and for real‐time images they were significant at the P < 0.05 level for half the sites (0.243–0.981). Conclusion : Overall, nerve and muscle ultrasound is a valid and reliable diagnostic imaging technique. Muscle Nerve, 2013

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom