Premium
Stimulus duration and pain in nerve conduction studies
Author(s) -
Tamura Akiko,
Sonoo Masahiro,
Hoshino Satoshi,
Iwanami Tomoko,
Shimada Hiroyuki,
Miki Takami,
Shimizu Teruo
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
muscle and nerve
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.025
H-Index - 145
eISSN - 1097-4598
pISSN - 0148-639X
DOI - 10.1002/mus.23446
Subject(s) - median nerve , medicine , stimulus (psychology) , stimulation , tibial nerve , ankle , anesthesia , wrist , motor nerve , surgery , psychology , anatomy , psychotherapist
It is generally believed that a shorter stimulus duration is less painful in nerve conduction studies (NCS). We investigated whether a shorter duration stimulus is actually less painful when the same physiological effect, such as supramaximal stimulation, is achieved in motor NCS. Methods: The tibial nerve was stimulated at the ankle in 14 control subjects and the median nerve at the wrist in 20 subjects. Two stimulations of different durations were given blindly, and each subject was asked to report which was more painful. Results: A 0.2‐ms‐duration stimulus was significantly less painful than those with longer or shorter durations for the tibial nerve. For the median nerve, the 0.05‐ and 0.2‐ms durations were equally less painful than a 1‐ms‐duration stimulus. Conclusions: As a common duration for motor NCS, 0.2 ms seems appropriate, because the tibial nerve stimulation was more painful than the median nerve stimulation. Muscle Nerve, 2013