Premium
Accuracy of diagnoses delivered by an automated hand‐held nerve conduction device in comparison to standard electrophysiological testing in patients with unilateral leg symptoms
Author(s) -
Schmidt Kevin,
Chinea Nataly Montes,
Sorenson Eric J.,
Strommen Jeffrey A.,
Boon Andrea J.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
muscle and nerve
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.025
H-Index - 145
eISSN - 1097-4598
pISSN - 0148-639X
DOI - 10.1002/mus.21911
Subject(s) - medicine , gold standard (test) , electromyography , nerve conduction , medical diagnosis , false positive paradox , nerve conduction study , lumbosacral joint , weakness , physical medicine and rehabilitation , surgery , physical therapy , radiology , computer science , machine learning
Automated hand‐held nerve conduction study (NCS) devices are being marketed for use in the diagnosis of lumbosacral radiculopathy (LSR). In this study we compared the specificity and sensitivity of a hand‐held NCS device for the detection of LSR with standard electrodiagnostic study (EDX). Methods: Fifty patients referred to a tertiary referral electromyography (EMG) laboratory for testing of predominantly unilateral leg symptoms (weakness, sensory complaints, and/or pain) were included in the investigation. Twenty‐five normal “control” subjects were later recruited to calculate the specificity of the automated protocol. All patients underwent standard EDX and automated testing. Results: Raw NCS data were comparable for both techniques; however, computer‐generated interpretations delivered by the automated device showed high sensitivity with low specificity (i.e., many false positives) in both symptomatic patients and normal controls. Conclusions: The automated device accurately recorded raw data, but the interpretations provided were overly sensitive and lacked the specificity necessary for a screening or diagnostic examination. Muscle Nerve, 2011