Premium
Which motor nerve conduction study is best in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow?
Author(s) -
Shakir Ali,
Micklesen Paula J.,
Robinson Lawrence R.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
muscle and nerve
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.025
H-Index - 145
eISSN - 1097-4598
pISSN - 0148-639X
DOI - 10.1002/mus.10513
Subject(s) - elbow , forearm , medicine , ulnar neuropathy , compound muscle action potential , median nerve , anatomy , ulnar nerve , electromyography , motor nerve , carpal tunnel syndrome , surgery , physical medicine and rehabilitation , electrophysiology
Abstract There is debate regarding how best to utilize ulnar motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV) to identify ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE). We used receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves to compare absolute across‐elbow MNCV with MNCV difference between elbow and forearm segments (VDIF) when recording from abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscles. Also, we determined how their utility was impacted by low amplitudes of compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs). We studied 85 subjects with UNE and 77 subjects with carpal tunnel syndrome but without clinical evidence of UNE. The UNE group was divided into three subgroups based on CMAP amplitude. At 95% specificity, MNCV sensitivities were 80% at ADM and 77% at FDI, and VDIF sensitivities were 51% at ADM and 38% at FDI. The ROC curves showed MNCV to be superior to VDIF across all amplitude subgroups; however, confidence intervals overlapped when amplitude was high. Muscle Nerve 29: 585–590, 2004