Premium
Monophasic and biphasic stimulation evoke different responses
Author(s) -
FieldFote Edelle C.,
Anderson Brent,
Robertson Valma J.,
Spielholz Neil I.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
muscle and nerve
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.025
H-Index - 145
eISSN - 1097-4598
pISSN - 0148-639X
DOI - 10.1002/mus.10414
Subject(s) - stimulus (psychology) , orthodromic , stimulation , audiology , perception , sensory system , sensory threshold , psychology , medicine , neuroscience , psychotherapist , cognitive science
In 31 subjects, psychophysiological sensory perception threshold and the waveform of orthodromic sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) produced by constant‐current 100‐μs monophasic negative pulses were compared to those produced by biphasic (negative–positive) symmetrical pulses (100‐μs per phase). In addition, the effects of 200‐μs monophasic negative pulses were studied. Graded stimuli were delivered to the index finger, and SNAPs were recorded over the median nerve at the wrist. Perception threshold was significantly different among the three conditions. Furthermore, in 26 subjects, at the lower intensities at which SNAPs first appeared, the evoked potential waveform had two small negative phases with biphasic stimuli, but a single negative phase in response to monophasic pulses. At higher stimulus intensities, all SNAPs had a single large negative phase regardless of the stimulus. These perception and waveform findings suggest that, contrary to historical belief, the trailing positive phase of a biphasic pulse has a stimulating effect at low stimulus intensities. Muscle Nerve 28: 239–241, 2003