Premium
Knee extensor torque, work, and EMG during subjectively graded dynamic contractions
Author(s) -
Pincivero Danny M.,
Dixon Paul T.,
Coelho Alan J.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
muscle and nerve
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.025
H-Index - 145
eISSN - 1097-4598
pISSN - 0148-639X
DOI - 10.1002/mus.10393
Subject(s) - exertion , perceived exertion , electromyography , physical medicine and rehabilitation , vastus medialis , work (physics) , torque , medicine , physical therapy , knee flexion , muscle contraction , anatomy , physics , heart rate , blood pressure , thermodynamics
We examined knee extensor peak torque, work, and electromyogram (EMG) during dynamic contractions to perceived exertion levels in men and women. Thirty subjects performed three maximal effort isokinetic knee extensions (60 deg.s −1 ), followed by three contractions to each of nine separate levels of perceived exertion. Surface EMG of the vastus medialis (VM), vastus lateralis (VL), and rectus femoris (RF), and knee extensor peak torque and work were normalized to a percent of each respective value obtained during the maximal effort contractions. The results demonstrated a significant linear increase in voluntary knee extensor peak torque and work across perceived exertion levels. Knee extensor peak torque and work were less than 70%, 80%, and 90% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) at perceived exertion levels 7, 8, and 9, respectively. A significant increase in VM, VL, and RF muscle EMG was observed across perceived exertion levels 1 through 9, with EMG increase highest for the VL. The findings demonstrate that dynamic contractions guided by perceived exertion are underproduced at relatively high perceptual intensities, and that reliance on VL activation occurs across submaximal torque levels. The overestimation of knee extensor peak torque and work at relatively high perceptual intensities may suggest the presence of a subconscious mechanism aiming to reduce high muscle and joint forces. Muscle Nerve 28: 54–61, 2003