Premium
Size of motor unit potential sample
Author(s) -
Podnar Simon,
Mrkaić Mićo
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
muscle and nerve
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.025
H-Index - 145
eISSN - 1097-4598
pISSN - 0148-639X
DOI - 10.1002/mus.10310
Subject(s) - motor unit , electromyography , external anal sphincter , statistics , sample size determination , sample (material) , outlier , normative , psychology , chemistry , mathematics , medicine , physical medicine and rehabilitation , neuroscience , chromatography , rectum , philosophy , anal canal , epistemology
In quantitative electromyography (EMG), a sample size of 20 motor unit potentials (MUPs) is standard. The effect of increase in the number of MUPs above 20 is not known, although advanced MUP analysis techniques make such samples practical. In the present study, using multi‐MUP analysis, pools of 3,720 neuropathic and 2,526 control MUPs were obtained from external anal sphincter muscles. From each pool, 10,000 random samples of 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 100 MUPs were obtained by a computer. For each sample size, 95% normative limits for mean values, SDs, and “outliers,” and sensitivities were calculated for eight MUP parameters. As the magnitude of MUP samples increased, normative limits narrowed and sensitivities increased (at 5: 20–30%; at 20: 30–55%; at 100: 80–100%) for all statistics of all MUP parameters. Our results demonstrated a substantial increase in sensitivity by increasing the MUP sample to more than 20. This option deserves consideration in an attempt to improve the usefulness of quantitative EMG. Muscle Nerve 27: 196–201, 2003