z-logo
Premium
The decision‐making threshold and the factors that affect it: A qualitative study of patients' decision‐making in knee replacement surgery
Author(s) -
Barlow T.,
Scott P.,
Thomson L.,
Griffin D.,
Realpe A.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
musculoskeletal care
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.628
H-Index - 28
eISSN - 1557-0681
pISSN - 1478-2189
DOI - 10.1002/msc.1190
Subject(s) - deliberation , thematic analysis , medicine , focus group , qualitative research , affect (linguistics) , population , patient participation , nursing , physical therapy , medline , psychology , social science , environmental health , communication , marketing , sociology , politics , political science , law , business
Background Osteoarthritis is a significant cause of burden to the ageing population and knee replacement is a common operation for treatment of end‐stage disease. We aimed to explore these factors to help understand patients' decision‐making, which is critical in informing patient‐centred care. These can be used to enhance decision‐making and dialogue between clinicians and patients, allowing a more informed choice. Methods The study consisted of two focus groups, in a patient cohort after total knee replacement followed by more in‐depth interviews to further test and explore themes from the focus groups, in patients in either the deliberation stage or the decision‐making stage. Results Using qualitative research methods (iterative thematic analysis) reviewing decision‐making and deliberation phases of making informed choices we found nine key themes that emerged from the study groups. Conclusions An awareness of the deliberation phase, the factors that influence it, the stress associated with it, preferred models of care, and the influence of the decision‐making threshold will aid useful communication between doctors and patients.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here