z-logo
Premium
Magnetization‐prepared spoiled gradient‐echo snapshot imaging for efficient measurement of R 2 ‐R 1ρ in knee cartilage
Author(s) -
Han Misung,
Tibrewala Radhika,
Bahroos Emma,
Pedoia Valentina,
Majumdar Sharmila
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.29024
Subject(s) - imaging phantom , cartilage , gradient echo , biomedical engineering , osteoarthritis , flip angle , nuclear magnetic resonance , reproducibility , agarose , in vivo , accuracy and precision , knee cartilage , materials science , t2 relaxation , repeatability , magnetization , magnetization transfer , nuclear medicine , chemistry , mathematics , articular cartilage , magnetic resonance imaging , physics , anatomy , radiology , medicine , chromatography , pathology , alternative medicine , microbiology and biotechnology , statistics , quantum mechanics , biology , magnetic field
Purpose To validate the potential of quantifying R 2 ‐R 1ρ using one pair of signals with T 1ρ preparation and T 2 preparation incorporated to magnetization‐prepared angle‐modulated partitioned k‐space spoiled gradient‐echo snapshots (MAPSS) acquisition and to find an optimal preparation time (T prep ) for in vivo knee MRI. Methods Bloch equation simulations were first performed to assess the accuracy of quantifying R 2 ‐R 1ρ using T 1ρ ‐ and T 2 ‐prepared signals with an equivalent T prep . For validation of this technique in comparison to the conventional approach that calculates R 2 ‐R 1ρ after estimating both T 2 and T 1ρ , phantom experiments and in vivo validation with five healthy subjects and five osteoarthritis patients were performed at a clinical 3T scanner. Results Bloch equation simulations demonstrated that the accuracy of this efficient R 2 ‐R 1ρ quantification method and the optimal T prep can be affected by image signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and tissue relaxation times, but quantification can be closest to the reference with an around 25 ms T prep for knee cartilage. Phantom experiments demonstrated that the proposed method can depict R 2 ‐R 1ρ changes with agarose gel concentration. With in vivo data, significant correlation was observed between cartilage R 2 ‐R 1ρ measured from the conventional and the proposed methods, and a T prep of 25.6 ms provided the most agreement by Bland‐Altman analysis. R 2 ‐R 1ρ was significantly lower in patients than in healthy subjects for most cartilage compartments. Conclusion As a potential biomarker to indicate cartilage degeneration, R 2 ‐R 1ρ can be efficiently measured using one pair of T 1ρ ‐prepared and T 2 ‐prepared signals with an optimal T prep considering cartilage relaxation times and image SNR.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom