Premium
Three‐dimensional assessment of brain arterial compliance: Technical development, comparison with aortic pulse wave velocity, and age effect
Author(s) -
Li Yang,
Lim Chantelle,
Schär Michael,
Jiang Dengrong,
Qiao Ye,
Pillai Jay J.,
Lu Hanzhang
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.28835
Subject(s) - pulse wave velocity , pulse (music) , arterial spin labeling , cardiac cycle , compliance (psychology) , biomedical engineering , cerebral blood flow , nuclear medicine , medicine , cardiology , blood pressure , physics , psychology , social psychology , detector , optics
Purpose The ability to measure cerebral vascular compliance (VC) is important in the evaluation of vascular diseases. Additionally, quantification of arterial wall pulsation in the brain may be useful for understanding the driving force of the recently discovered glymphatic system. Our goal is to develop an MRI technique to measure VC and arterial wall pulsation in major intracranial vessels. Methods A total of 17 healthy subjects were studied on a 3T MRI system. The technique, called VaCom‐PCASL, uses pseudo‐continuous arterial spin labeling (PCASL) to obtain pure blood vessel signal, uses a 3D radial acquisition, and applies a golden‐angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP) algorithm for image reconstruction. The k‐space data were retrospectively sorted into different cardiac phases. The GRASP algorithm allows the reconstruction of 5D (three spatial dimensions, one control/label dimension, and one cardiac‐phase dimension) data simultaneously. The proposed technique was optimized in terms of reconstruction parameters and labeling duration. Intracranial VC was compared with aortic pulse wave velocity measured with phase‐contrast MRI. Age differences in VC were studied. Results The VaCom‐PCASL technique using 10 cardiac phases and GRASP sparsity constraints of λ label/control = 0.05 and λ cardiac = 0.05 provided the highest contrast‐to‐noise ratio. A labeling duration of 800 ms was found to yield signals comparable to those of longer duration ( P > .2), whereas 400 ms yielded significant overestimation ( P < .005). A significant correlation was observed between intracranial VC and aortic pulse wave velocity ( r = −0.73, P = .038, N = 8). Vascular compliance in the older group was lower than that in the younger group. Conclusion The VaCom‐PCASL‐MRI technique represents a promising approach for noninvasive assessment of arterial stiffness and pulsatility.