z-logo
Premium
Simultaneous pro ton density f at‐fraction and R 2 ∗ i maging with water‐specific T 1 mapping (PROFIT 1 ): application in liver
Author(s) -
Thompson Richard B.,
Chow Kelvin,
Mager Diana,
Pagano Joseph J.,
Grenier Justin
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.28434
Subject(s) - flip angle , imaging phantom , nonalcoholic fatty liver disease , nuclear magnetic resonance , nuclear medicine , mathematics , in vivo , chemistry , analytical chemistry (journal) , magnetic resonance imaging , physics , fatty liver , medicine , chromatography , radiology , microbiology and biotechnology , disease , biology
Purpose To describe and validate a simultaneous proton density fat‐fraction (PDFF) imaging and water‐specific T 1 mapping (T 1(Water) ) approach for the liver (PROFIT 1 ) with R 2 ∗ mapping and low sensitivity to B 1 + calibration or inhomogeneity. Methods A multiecho gradient‐echo sequence, with and without saturation preparation, was designed for simultaneous imaging of liver PDFF, R 2 ∗ , and T 1(Water) (three slices in ~13 seconds). Chemical‐shift‐encoded MRI processing yielded fat‐water separated images and R 2 ∗ maps. T 1(Water)  calculation utilized saturation and nonsaturation‐recovery water‐separated images. Several variable flip angle schemes across k‐space (increasing flip angles in sequential RF pulses) were evaluated for minimization of T 1 weighting, to reduce the B 1 + dependence of T 1(Water)  and PDFF (reduced flip angle dependence). T 1(Water)  accuracy was validated in mixed fat‐water phantoms, with various PDFF and T 1 values (3T). In vivo application was illustrated in five volunteers and five patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (PDFF, T 1(Water) , R 2 ∗ ). Results A sin 3 (θ) flip angle pattern (0 < θ < π/2 over k‐space) yielded the largest PROFIT 1 signal yield with negligible B 1 + dependence for both T 1(Water) and PDFF. Mixed fat‐water phantom experiments illustrated excellent agreement between PROFIT 1 and gold‐standard spectroscopic evaluation of PDFF and T 1(Water)  (<1% T 1 error). In vivo PDFF, T 1(Water) , and R 2 ∗ maps illustrated independence of the PROFIT 1 values from B 1 + inhomogeneity and significant differences between volunteers and patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease for T 1(Water) (927 ± 56 ms vs. 1033 ± 23 ms; P  < .05) and PDFF (2.0% ± 0.8% vs. 13.4% ± 5.0%, P  < .05).  R 2 ∗ was similar between groups. Conclusion The PROFIT 1 pulse sequence provides fast simultaneous quantification of PDFF, T 1(Water) , and R 2 ∗ with minimal sensitivity to B 1 + miscalibration or inhomogeneity.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom