Premium
Real‐time Triggered RAdial Single‐Shot Inversion recovery for arrhythmia‐insensitive myocardial T1 mapping: motion phantom validation and in vivo comparison
Author(s) -
Gensler Daniel,
Salinger Tim,
Düring Markus,
Lorenz Kristina,
Jahns Roland,
Wech Tobias,
Frantz Stefan,
Ertl Georg,
Jakob Peter M.,
Nordbeck Peter
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.27526
Subject(s) - imaging phantom , image quality , single shot , computer science , artificial intelligence , sinus rhythm , pulse sequence , cardiac imaging , biomedical engineering , cardiac cycle , computer vision , nuclear medicine , medicine , pattern recognition (psychology) , radiology , physics , cardiology , atrial fibrillation , image (mathematics) , optics
Purpose Cardiac T 1 mapping has become an increasingly important imaging technique, contributing novel diagnostic options. However, currently utilized methods are often associated with accuracy problems because of heart rate variations and cardiac arrhythmia, limiting their value in clinical routine. This study aimed to introduce an improved arrhythmia‐related robust T 1 mapping sequence called RT‐TRASSI (real‐time Triggered RAdial Single‐Shot Inversion recovery). Methods All measurements were performed on a 3.0T whole‐body imaging system. A real‐time feedback algorithm for arrhythmia detection was implemented into the previously described pulse sequence. A programmable motion phantom was constructed and measurements with different simulated arrhythmias arranged. T 1 mapping accuracy and susceptibility to artifacts were analyzed. In addition, in vivo measurements and comparisons with 3 prevailing T 1 mapping sequences (MOLLI, ShMOLLI, and SASHA) were carried out to investigate the occurrence of artifacts. Results In the motion phantom measurements, RT‐TRASSI showed excellent agreement with predetermined reference T 1 values. Percentage scattering of the T 1 values ranged from –0.6% to +1.9% in sinus rhythm and –1.0% to +3.1% for high‐grade arrhythmias. In vivo, RT‐TRASSI showed diagnostic image quality with only 6% of the acquired T 1 maps including image artifacts. In contrast, more than 40% of the T 1 maps acquired with MOLLI, ShMOLLI, or SASHA included motion artifacts. Conclusion Accuracy issues because of heart rate variability and arrhythmia are a prevailing problem in current cardiac T 1 mapping techniques. With RT‐TRASSI, artifacts can be minimized because of the short acquisition time and effective real‐time feedback, avoiding potential data acquisition during systolic heart phase.