Premium
Wideband myocardial perfusion pulse sequence for imaging patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device
Author(s) -
Hong KyungPyo,
Collins Jeremy D.,
Knight Bradley P.,
Carr James C.,
Lee Daniel C.,
Kim Daniel
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.27458
Subject(s) - perfusion , artifact (error) , medicine , imaging phantom , nuclear medicine , wideband , pulse sequence , biomedical engineering , radiology , computer science , physics , artificial intelligence , optics
Purpose To develop a wideband cardiac perfusion pulse sequence and test whether it is capable of suppressing image artifacts in patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED), while not exceeding the specific absorption rate (SAR) limit (2.0 W/kg). Methods A wideband perfusion pulse sequence was developed by incorporating a wideband saturation pulse to achieve a good balance between saturation of magnetization and SAR. Clinical standard and wideband perfusion MRI scans were performed back‐to‐back in a randomized order on 16 patients with a CIED undergoing clinical cardiac MRI. Two expert readers graded the artifact intensity and extent on a segmental basis using a 5‐point Likert scale, where significant artifact was defined by a composite score. The variance in myocardial signal prior to tissue‐enhancement was analyzed to quantify artifact‐intensity. Whole‐body SAR values computed by the MR scanner were read from the DICOM header. Either a paired t‐test or Wilcoxon signed‐rank test was performed to compare two groups. Results While the mean whole‐body SAR for a single‐slice wideband perfusion scan (0.38 ± 0.08W/kg) was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than for a single‐slice standard perfusion scan (0.11 ± 0.03W/kg), it was 81% below 2.0 W/kg. The mean variance in myocardial signal prior to tissue‐enhancement was significantly (p < 0.001) higher for standard (422.6 ± 306.6 a.u.) than wideband (107.0 ± 60.9 a.u.). Among 105 myocardial segments, standard produced 19 segments (18%) that were deemed to have significant artifacts, whereas wideband produced only 3 segments (3%). Conclusion A wideband perfusion pulse sequence is capable of suppressing image artifacts induced by a CIED while not exceeding SAR at 2.0 W/kg.