z-logo
Premium
Multicenter reproducibility of quantitative susceptibility mapping in a gadolinium phantom using MEDI+0 automatic zero referencing
Author(s) -
Deh Kofi,
Kawaji Keigo,
Bulk Marjolein,
Van Der Weerd Louise,
Lind Emelie,
Spincemaille Pascal,
McCabe Gillen Kelly,
Van Auderkerke Johan,
Wang Yi,
Nguyen Thanh D.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.27410
Subject(s) - reproducibility , imaging phantom , gadolinium , zero (linguistics) , nuclear medicine , nuclear magnetic resonance , quantitative susceptibility mapping , computer science , medicine , radiology , magnetic resonance imaging , materials science , chemistry , physics , chromatography , metallurgy , linguistics , philosophy
Purpose To determine the reproducibility of quantitative susceptibility mapping at multiple sites on clinical and preclinical scanners (1.5 T, 3 T, 7 T, and 9.4 T) from different vendors (Siemens, GE, Philips, and Bruker) for standardization of multicenter studies. Methods Seven phantoms distributed from the core site, each containing 5 compartments with gadolinium solutions with fixed concentrations between 0.625 mM and 10 mM. Multi‐echo gradient echo scans were performed at 1.5 T, 3 T, 7 T, and 9.4 T on 12 clinical and 3 preclinical scanners. DICOM images from the scans were processed into quantitative susceptibility maps using the Laplacian boundary value (LBV) and MEDI+0 automatic uniform reference algorithm. Region of interest (ROI) analyses were performed by a physicist to determine agreement between results from all sites. Measurement reproducibility was assessed using regression, Bland‐Altman plots, and the intra‐class correlation coefficient (ICC). Results Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) from all scanners had similar, artifact‐free visual appearance. Regression analysis showed a linear relationship between gadolinium concentrations and average QSM measurements for all phantoms (y = 350x – 0.0346, r 2 >0.99). The SD of measurements increased almost linearly from 32 ppb to 230 ppb as the measured susceptibility increased from 0.26 ppm to 3.56 ppm. A Bland‐Altman plot showed the bias, upper, and lower limits of agreement for all comparisons were −10, −210, and 200 ppb, respectively. The ICC was 0.991 with a 95% CI (0.973, 0.99). Conclusions QSM shows excellent multicenter reproducibility for a large range of susceptibility values encountered in cranial and extra‐cranial applications on a diverse set of scanner platforms.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom