z-logo
Premium
Sensitivity regularization of the Cramér‐Rao lower bound to minimize B 1 nonuniformity effects in quantitative magnetization transfer imaging
Author(s) -
Boudreau Mathieu,
Pike G. Bruce
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.27337
Subject(s) - cramér–rao bound , upper and lower bounds , regularization (linguistics) , robustness (evolution) , physics , sensitivity (control systems) , mathematics , algorithm , chemistry , mathematical analysis , computer science , artificial intelligence , biochemistry , electronic engineering , engineering , gene
Purpose To develop and validate a regularization approach of optimizing B 1 insensitivity of the quantitative magnetization transfer (qMT) pool‐size ratio ( F ). Methods An expression describing the impact of B 1 inaccuracies on qMT fitting parameters was derived using a sensitivity analysis. To simultaneously optimize for robustness against noise and B 1 inaccuracies, the optimization condition was defined as the Cramér‐Rao lower bound (CRLB) regularized by the B 1 ‐sensitivity expression for the parameter of interest ( F ). The qMT protocols were iteratively optimized from an initial search space, with and without B 1 regularization. Three 10‐point qMT protocols (Uniform, CRLB, CRLB+B 1 regularization) were compared using Monte Carlo simulations for a wide range of conditions (e.g., SNR, B 1 inaccuracies, tissues). Results The B 1 ‐regularized CRLB optimization protocol resulted in the best robustness of F against B 1 errors, for a wide range of SNR and for both white matter and gray matter tissues. For SNR = 100, this protocol resulted in errors of less than 1% in mean F values for B 1 errors ranging between −10 and 20%, the range of B 1 values typically observed in vivo in the human head at field strengths of 3 T and less. Both CRLB‐optimized protocols resulted in the lowest σ F values for all SNRs and did not increase in the presence of B 1 inaccuracies. Conclusion This work demonstrates a regularized optimization approach for improving the robustness of auxiliary measurements (e.g., B 1 ) sensitivity of qMT parameters, particularly the pool‐size ratio ( F ). Predicting substantially less B 1 sensitivity using protocols optimized with this method, B 1 mapping could even be omitted for qMT studies primarily interested in F .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom