Premium
A diffusion‐based method for long‐ T 2 suppression in steady state sequences: Validation and application for 3D‐UTE imaging
Author(s) -
Soustelle Lucas,
Lamy Julien,
Rousseau François,
Armspach JeanPaul,
Loureiro de Sousa Paulo
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.27057
Subject(s) - weighting , signal (programming language) , nuclear magnetic resonance , imaging phantom , pulse sequence , diffusion , physics , pulse (music) , sequence (biology) , bloch equations , algorithm , steady state (chemistry) , computer science , chemistry , acoustics , optics , biochemistry , detector , thermodynamics , programming language
Purpose To introduce a novel method for long‐ T 2 signal physical suppression in steady‐state based on configuration states combination and modulation using diffusion weighting. Its efficiency in yielding a high contrast in short‐ T 2 structures using an ultrashort echo time acquisition module (Diff‐UTE) is compared to the adiabatically prepared Inversion‐Recovery‐UTE sequence (IR‐UTE). Theory and Methods Using a rectangular‐pulse prepared 3D‐UTE sequence, the possibility of long‐ T 2 component signal cancellation through diffusion effects is addressed, and the condition met for sets of sequence parameters. Simultaneously, the short‐ T 2 component signal is maximized using a Bloch equation‐based optimization process. The method is evaluated from simulations, and experiments are conducted on a phantom composed of short and long‐ T 2 components, as well as on an ex vivo mouse head. Results Within equal scan times, the proposed method allowed for an efficient long‐ T 2 signal suppression, and expectedly yielded a higher signal to noise ratio in short‐ T 2 structures compared to the IR‐UTE technique, although an intrinsic short‐ T 2 signal loss is expected through the preparation module. Conclusion The Diff‐UTE method represents an interesting alternative to the IR‐UTE technique. Diffusion weighting allowing for a long‐ T 2 suppression results in a less penalizing method to generate a high and selective contrast in short‐ T 2 components. Magn Reson Med 80:548–559, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom