Premium
Magnetic resonance fingerprinting using echo‐planar imaging: Joint quantification of T 1 and T 2 ∗ relaxation times
Author(s) -
Rieger Benedikt,
Zimmer Fabian,
Zapp Jascha,
Weingärtner Sebastian,
Schad Lothar R.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.26561
Subject(s) - magnetic resonance imaging , imaging phantom , standard deviation , computer science , nuclear magnetic resonance , k space , image quality , robustness (evolution) , flip angle , materials science , artificial intelligence , physics , mathematics , optics , chemistry , medicine , radiology , image (mathematics) , statistics , biochemistry , gene
Purpose To develop an implementation of the magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) paradigm for quantitative imaging using echo‐planar imaging (EPI) for simultaneous assessment of T 1 andT 2 ∗ . Methods The proposed MRF method (MRF‐EPI) is based on the acquisition of 160 gradient‐spoiled EPI images with rapid, parallel‐imaging accelerated, Cartesian readout and a measurement time of 10 s per slice. Contrast variation is induced using an initial inversion pulse, and varying the flip angles, echo times, and repetition times throughout the sequence. Joint quantification of T 1 andT 2 ∗is performed using dictionary matching with integratedB 1 +correction. The quantification accuracy of the method was validated in phantom scans and in vivo in 6 healthy subjects. Results Joint T 1 andT 2 ∗parameter maps acquired with MRF‐EPI in phantoms are in good agreement with reference measurements, showing deviations under 5% and 4% for T 1 andT 2 ∗ , respectively. In vivo baseline images were visually free of artifacts. In vivo relaxation times are in good agreement with gold‐standard techniques (deviation T 1 : 4 ± 2%,T 2 ∗ : 4 ± 5%). The visual quality was comparable to the in vivo gold standard, despite substantially shortened scan times. Conclusion The proposed MRF‐EPI method provides fast and accurate T 1 andT 2 ∗quantification. This approach offers a rapid supplement to the non‐Cartesian MRF portfolio, with potentially increased usability and robustness. Magn Reson Med 78:1724–1733, 2017. © 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.