z-logo
Premium
Improving the robustness of pseudo‐continuous arterial spin labeling to off‐resonance and pulsatile flow velocity
Author(s) -
Zhao Li,
Vidorreta Marta,
Soman Salil,
Detre John A.,
Alsop David C.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.26513
Subject(s) - pulsatile flow , magnetic resonance imaging , robustness (evolution) , nuclear magnetic resonance , arterial spin labeling , magnetic resonance angiography , biomedical engineering , chemistry , physics , medicine , cardiology , radiology , biochemistry , gene
Purpose To improve pseudo‐continuous arterial spin labeling (PCASL) robustness to off‐resonance and pulsatile blood flow velocity. Methods Bloch equations were solved to evaluate the effect of labeling parameters in a pulsatile flow model for a range of off‐resonance. Experimental confirmation was achieved in volunteers using linear phase increase between labeling pulses to approximate off‐resonance errors. We first assessed the location of the labeling plane in four volunteers. Next, we explored a range of parameters—including balanced and unbalanced gradients—in five more volunteers at an optimal labeling plane location. Results Simulations demonstrated that 1) high velocities are vulnerable to off‐resonance, 2) unbalanced PCASL outperforms balanced PCASL, 3) increased B1 and low average gradient improve the labeling efficiency for high‐velocity flow, and 4) a low ratio of selective to average gradient improves off‐resonance robustness. A good agreement between theory and experiment was observed. Conclusion The robustness of PCASL can be increased by selecting an unbalanced scheme with a low average gradient (0.5 mT/m), a low ratio (7×) of selective to average gradients, and the highest feasible B1 (1.8 μT). Placing the labeling plane above the carotid bifurcation and below the V3 segment, usually between the second and third vertebrae, yielded robust results. Magn Reson Med 78:1342–1351, 2017. © 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here