Premium
Comparison of glycosaminoglycan chemical exchange saturation transfer using Gaussian‐shaped and off‐resonant spin‐lock radiofrequency pulses in intervertebral disks
Author(s) -
MüllerLutz Anja,
Cronenberg Tom,
Schleich Christoph,
Wickrath Frithjof,
Zaiss Moritz,
Boos Johannes,
Wittsack HansJörg
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.26362
Subject(s) - chemistry , magnetization transfer , nuclear magnetic resonance , intervertebral disk , magnetic resonance imaging , lumbar , analytical chemistry (journal) , intervertebral disc , saturation (graph theory) , nuclear medicine , anatomy , physics , medicine , radiology , mathematics , chromatography , combinatorics
Purpose To investigate, if a train of spin‐lock pulses (chemical exchange saturation transfer with spin‐lock pulses = CESL) improves biochemical glycosaminoglycan imaging compared with conventional chemical exchange saturation transfer with Gaussian‐shaped pulses (CEST) in lumbar intervertebral discs. Methods T 2 , CEST, and CESL imaging was performed in lumbar intervertebral discs of 15 healthy volunteers at 3 Tesla. Mean and standard deviation of the asymmetric magnetization transfer ratio (MTR asym ), the asymmetric spin‐lock ratio (SLR asym ) and T 2 values were calculated for nucleus pulposus (NP) and annulus fibrosus (AF). Wilcoxon test was used to analyze differences between MTR asym and SLR asym . Pearson correlation was used to determine the relationship between MTR asym , SLR asym and T 2 . Results Data showed no significant difference between MTR asym and SLR asym (NP: P = 0.35; AF: P = 0.34). MTR asym and SLR asym values differed significantly between NP and AF (MTR asym : P = 0.014, SLR asym : P = 0.005). T 2 values correlated significantly with MTR asym (NP: ρ = 0.76, P < 0.001; AF: ρ = 0.60, P < 0.001) and SLR asym (NP: ρ = 0.73, P < 0.001; AF: ρ = 0.47, P < 0.001). Conclusion CESL does not improve the chemical exchange asymmetry effect compared with conventional CEST, but leads to comparable results. Magn Reson Med 78:280–284, 2017. © 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom