z-logo
Premium
Amide proton transfer imaging of brain tumors using a self‐corrected 3D fast spin‐echo dixon method: Comparison With separate B 0 correction
Author(s) -
Togao Osamu,
Keupp Jochen,
Hiwatashi Akio,
Yamashita Koji,
Kikuchi Kazufumi,
Yoneyama Masami,
Honda Hiroshi
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.26322
Subject(s) - nuclear magnetic resonance , spin echo , echo (communications protocol) , proton , magnetization transfer , fast spin echo , magnetic resonance imaging , nuclear medicine , physics , computer science , medicine , radiology , nuclear physics , computer network
Purpose To assess the quantitative performance of three‐dimensional (3D) fast spin‐echo (FSE) Dixon amide proton transfer (APT) imaging of brain tumors compared with B 0 correction with separate mapping methods. Methods Twenty‐two patients with brain tumors (54.2 ± 18.7 years old, 12 males and 10 females) were scanned at 3 Tesla (T). Z‐spectra were obtained at seven different frequency offsets at ±3.1 ppm, ± 3.5 ppm, ± 3.9 ppm, and −1560 ppm. The scan was repeated three times at +3.5 ppm with echo shifts for Dixon B 0 mapping. The APT image corrected by a three‐point Dixon‐type B 0 map from the same scan (3D‐Dixon) or a separate B 0 map (2D‐separate and 3D‐separate), and an uncorrected APT image (3D‐uncorrected) were generated. We compared the APT‐weighted signals within a tumor obtained with each 3D method with those obtained with 2D‐separate as a reference standard. Results Excellent agreements and correlations with the 2D‐separate were obtained by the 3D‐Dixon method for both mean (ICC = 0.964, r = 0.93, P  < 0.0001) and 90th‐percentile (ICC = 0.972, r = 0.95, P  < 0.0001) APT‐weighted signals. These agreements and correlations for 3D‐Dixon were better than those obtained by the 3D‐uncorrected and 3D‐separate methods. Conclusion The 3D FSE Dixon APT method with intrinsic B 0 correction offers a quantitative performance that is similar to that of established two‐dimensional (2D) methods. Magn Reson Med 77:2272–2279, 2017. © 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom