z-logo
Premium
A flexible nested sodium and proton coil array with wideband matching for knee cartilage MRI at 3T
Author(s) -
Brown Ryan,
Lakshmanan Karthik,
Madelin Guillaume,
Alon Leeor,
Chang Gregory,
Sodickson Daniel K.,
Regatte Ravinder R.,
Wiggins Graham C.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.26017
Subject(s) - matching (statistics) , cartilage , electromagnetic coil , wideband , nuclear magnetic resonance , knee cartilage , computer science , biomedical engineering , physics , anatomy , medicine , osteoarthritis , articular cartilage , optics , pathology , quantum mechanics , alternative medicine
Purpose We describe a 2 × 6 channel sodium/proton array for knee MRI at 3T. Multielement coil arrays are desirable because of well‐known signal‐to‐noise ratio advantages over volume and single‐element coils. However, low tissue–coil coupling that is characteristic of coils operating at low frequency can make the potential gains from a phased array difficult to realize. Methods The issue of low tissue–coil coupling in the developed six‐channel sodium receive array was addressed by implementing 1) a mechanically flexible former to minimize the coil‐to‐tissue distance and reduce the overall diameter of the array and 2) a wideband matching scheme that counteracts preamplifier noise degradation caused by coil coupling and a high‐quality factor. The sodium array was complemented with a nested proton array to enable standard MRI. Results The wideband matching scheme and tight‐fitting mechanical design contributed to >30% central signal‐to‐noise ratio gain on the sodium module over a mononuclear sodium birdcage coil, and the performance of the proton module was sufficient for clinical imaging. Conclusion We expect the strategies presented in this study to be generally relevant in high‐density receive arrays, particularly in x‐nuclei or small animal applications. Magn Reson Med 76:1325–1334, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here