Premium
Extended Monopole antenna Array with individual Shield (EMAS) coil: An improved monopole antenna design for brain imaging at 7 tesla MRI
Author(s) -
Woo MyungKyun,
Hong SukMin,
Lee Jongho,
Kang ChangKi,
Park SungYeon,
Son YoungDon,
Kim YoungBo,
Cho ZangHee
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.25837
Subject(s) - electromagnetic coil , radiofrequency coil , acoustics , antenna (radio) , sensitivity (control systems) , physics , monopole antenna , coil noise , shield , nuclear magnetic resonance , shielded cable , optics , computer science , geology , electronic engineering , telecommunications , engineering , petrology , quantum mechanics , rogowski coil
Purpose To propose a new Extended Monopole antenna Array with individual Shields (EMAS) coil that improves the B 1 field coverage and uniformity along the z‐direction. Methods To increase the spatial coverage of Monopole antenna Array (MA) coil, each monopole antenna was shielded and extended in length. Performance of this new coil, which is referred to as EMAS coil, was compared with the original MA coil and an Extended Monopole antenna Array coil with no shield (EMA). For comparison, flip angle, signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), and receive sensitivity maps were measured at multiple regions of interest (ROIs) in the brain. Results The EMAS coil demonstrated substantially larger flip angle and receive sensitivity than the MA and EMA coils in the inferior aspect of the brain. In the brainstem ROI, for example, the flip angle in the EMAS coil was increased by 45.5% (or 60.0%) and the receive sensitivity was increased by 26.9% (or 14.9%), resulting in an SNR gain of 84.8% (or 76.3%) when compared with the MA coil (or EMA). Conclusion The EMAS coil provided 25.7% (or 24.4%) more uniformB 1 +field distribution compared with the MA (or EMA) coil in sagittal. The EMAS coil successfully extended the imaging volume in lower part of the brain. Magn Reson Med 75:2566–2572, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.