Premium
Improved quantitative myocardial T 2 mapping: Impact of the fitting model
Author(s) -
Akçakaya Mehmet,
Basha Tamer A.,
Weingärtner Sebastian,
Roujol Sébastien,
Berg Sophie,
Nezafat Reza
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.25377
Subject(s) - imaging phantom , voxel , t2 relaxation , robustness (evolution) , estimation theory , computer science , nuclear magnetic resonance , algorithm , artificial intelligence , magnetic resonance imaging , physics , optics , medicine , radiology , chemistry , biochemistry , gene
Purpose To develop an improved T 2 prepared (T 2 prep) balanced steady‐state free‐precession (bSSFP) sequence and signal relaxation curve fitting method for myocardial T 2 mapping. Methods Myocardial T 2 mapping is commonly performed by acquisition of multiple T 2 prep bSSFP images and estimating the voxel‐wise T 2 values using a two‐parameter fit for relaxation. However, a two‐parameter fit model does not take into account the effect of imaging pulses in a bSSFP sequence or other imperfections in T 2 prep RF pulses, which may decrease the robustness of T 2 mapping. Therefore, we propose a novel T 2 mapping sequence that incorporates an additional image acquired with saturation preparation, simulating a very long T 2 prep echo time. This enables the robust estimation of T 2 maps using a 3‐parameter fit model, which captures the effect of imaging pulses and other imperfections. Phantom imaging is performed to compare the T 2 maps generated using the proposed 3‐parameter model with the conventional two‐parameter model, as well as a spin echo reference. In vivo imaging is performed on eight healthy subjects to compare the different fitting models. Results Phantom and in vivo data show that the T 2 values generated by the proposed 3‐parameter model fitting do not change with different choices of the T 2 prep echo times, and are not statistically different than the reference values for the phantom ( P = 0.10 with three T 2 prep echoes). The two‐parameter model exhibits dependence on the choice of T 2 prep echo times and are significantly different than the reference values ( P = 0.01 with three T 2 prep echoes). Conclusion The proposed imaging sequence in combination with a three‐parameter model allows accurate measurement of myocardial T 2 values, which is independent of number and duration of T 2 prep echo times. Magn Reson Med 74:93–105, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom