z-logo
Premium
Accelerated fractional ventilation imaging with hyperpolarized Gas MRI
Author(s) -
Emami Kiarash,
Xu Yinan,
Hamedani Hooman,
Profka Harrilla,
Kadlecek Stephen,
Xin Yi,
Ishii Masaru,
Rizi Rahim R.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.24582
Subject(s) - undersampling , acceleration , biomedical engineering , ventilation (architecture) , imaging phantom , magnetic resonance imaging , signal (programming language) , image resolution , electromagnetic coil , phased array , nuclear magnetic resonance , nuclear medicine , chemistry , physics , computer science , optics , medicine , artificial intelligence , radiology , classical mechanics , quantum mechanics , thermodynamics , programming language , telecommunications , antenna (radio)
Purpose To investigate the utility of accelerated imaging to enhance multibreath fractional ventilation ( r ) measurement accuracy using hyperpolarized gas MRI. Undersampling shortens the breath‐hold time, thereby reducing the O 2 ‐induced signal decay and allows subjects to maintain a more physiologically relevant breathing pattern. Additionally, it may improve r estimation accuracy by reducing radiofrequency destruction of hyperpolarized gas. Methods Image acceleration was achieved using an eight‐channel phased array coil. Undersampled image acquisition was simulated in a series of ventilation images and data was reconstructed for various matrix sizes (48–128) using generalized auto‐calibrating partially parallel acquisition. Parallel accelerated r imaging was also performed on five mechanically ventilated pigs. Results Optimal acceleration factor was fairly invariable (2.0–2.2×) over the range of simulated resolutions. Estimation accuracy progressively improved with higher resolutions (39–51% error reduction). In vivo r values were not significantly different between the two methods: 0.27 ± 0.09, 0.35 ± 0.06, 0.40 ± 0.04 (standard) versus 0.23 ± 0.05, 0.34 ± 0.03, 0.37 ± 0.02 (accelerated); for anterior, medial, and posterior slices, respectively, whereas the corresponding vertical r gradients were significant ( P < 0.001): 0.021 ± 0.007 (standard) versus 0.019 ± 0.005 (accelerated) (cm −1 ). Conclusion Quadruple phased array coil simulations resulted in an optimal acceleration factor of ∼2× independent of imaging resolution. Results advocate undersampled image acceleration to improve accuracy of fractional ventilation measurement with hyperpolarized gas MRI. Magn Reson Med 70:1353–1359, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom