z-logo
Premium
Spatially selective implementation of the adiabatic T 2 prep sequence for magnetic resonance angiography of the coronary arteries
Author(s) -
Soleimanifard Sahar,
Schär Michael,
Hays Allison G.,
Prince Jerry L.,
Weiss Robert G.,
Stuber Matthias
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.24437
Subject(s) - blood flow , nuclear magnetic resonance , magnetic resonance imaging , magnetization , spins , coronary arteries , signal to noise ratio (imaging) , signal (programming language) , physics , artery , nuclear medicine , medicine , radiology , computer science , optics , condensed matter physics , magnetic field , quantum mechanics , programming language
In coronary magnetic resonance angiography, a magnetization‐preparation scheme for T 2 ‐weighting (T 2 Prep) is widely used to enhance contrast between the coronary blood‐pool and the myocardium. This prepulse is commonly applied without spatial selection to minimize flow sensitivity, but the nonselective implementation results in a reduced magnetization of the in‐flowing blood and a related penalty in signal‐to‐noise ratio. It is hypothesized that a spatially selective T 2 Prep would leave the magnetization of blood outside the T 2 Prep volume unaffected and thereby lower the signal‐to‐noise ratio penalty. To test this hypothesis, a spatially selective T 2 Prep was implemented where the user could freely adjust angulation and position of the T 2 Prep slab to avoid covering the ventricular blood‐pool and saturating the in‐flowing spins. A time gap of 150 ms was further added between the T 2 Prep and other prepulses to allow for in‐flow of a larger volume of unsaturated spins. Consistent with numerical simulation, the spatially selective T 2 Prep increased in vivo human coronary artery signal‐to‐noise ratio (42.3 ± 2.9 vs. 31.4 ± 2.2, n = 22, P < 0.0001) and contrast‐to‐noise‐ratio (18.6 ± 1.5 vs. 13.9 ± 1.2, P = 0.009) as compared to those of the nonselective T 2 Prep. Additionally, a segmental analysis demonstrated that the spatially selective T 2 Prep was most beneficial in proximal and mid segments where the in‐flowing blood volume was largest compared to the distal segments. Magn Reson Med, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom