z-logo
Premium
Chemical shift‐induced phase errors in phase‐contrast MRI
Author(s) -
Middione Matthew J.,
Ennis Daniel B.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.24262
Subject(s) - magnetic resonance imaging , nuclear magnetic resonance , in vivo , phase difference , phase contrast microscopy , nuclear medicine , phase (matter) , chemistry , materials science , mathematics , biomedical engineering , analytical chemistry (journal) , medicine , physics , radiology , optics , microbiology and biotechnology , organic chemistry , chromatography , biology
Phase‐contrast magnetic resonance imaging is subject to numerous sources of error, which decrease clinical confidence in the reported measures. This work outlines how stationary perivascular fat can impart a significant chemical shift induced phase‐contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurement error using computational simulations, in vitro, and in vivo experiments. This chemical shift error does not subtract in phase difference processing, but can be minimized with proper parameter selection. The chemical shift induced phase errors largely depend on both the receiver bandwidth and the TE. Both theory and an in vivo comparison of the maximum difference in net forward flow between vessels with and without perivascular fat indicated that the effects of chemically shifted perivascular fat are minimized by the use of high bandwidth (814 Hz/px) and an in‐phase TE (high BW‐TE IN ). In healthy volunteers ( N = 10) high BW‐TE IN significantly improves intrapatient net forward flow agreement compared with low bandwidth (401 Hz/px) and a mid‐phase TE as indicated by significantly decreased measurement biases and limits of agreement for the ascending aorta (1.8 ± 0.5 mL vs. 6.4 ± 2.8 mL, P = 0.01), main pulmonary artery (2.0 ± 0.9 mL vs. 11.9 ± 5.8 mL, P = 0.04), the left pulmonary artery (1.3 ± 0.9 mL vs. 5.4 ± 2.5 mL, P = 0.003), and all vessels (1.7 ± 0.8 mL vs. 7.2 ± 4.4 mL, P = 0.001). Magn Reson Med, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here