z-logo
Premium
The MRI‐measured arterial input function resulting from a bolus injection of Gd‐DTPA in a rat model of stroke slightly underestimates that of Gd‐[ 14 C]DTPA and marginally overestimates the blood‐to‐brain influx rate constant determined by Patlak plots
Author(s) -
Nagaraja Tavarekere N.,
Karki Kishor,
Ewing James R.,
Divine George W.,
Fenstermacher Joseph D.,
Patlak Clifford S.,
Knight Robert A.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.22339
Subject(s) - gadolinium , medicine , nuclear medicine , diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid , bolus (digestion) , cohort , nuclear magnetic resonance , chemistry , physics , organic chemistry , chelation
The hypothesis that the arterial input function (AIF) of gadolinium‐diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid injected by intravenous bolus and measured by the change in the T 1 ‐relaxation rate (Δ R 1 ; R 1 = 1/ T 1 ) of superior sagittal sinus blood (AIF‐I) approximates the AIF of 14 C‐labeled gadolinium‐diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid measured in arterial blood (reference AIF) was tested in a rat stroke model ( n = 13). Contrary to the hypothesis, the initial part of the Δ R 1 ‐time curve was underestimated, and the area under the normalized curve for AIF‐I was about 15% lower than that for the reference AIF. Hypothetical AIFs for gadolinium‐diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid were derived from the reference AIF values and averaged to obtain a cohort‐averaged AIF. Influx rate constants (K i ) and proton distribution volumes at zero time (V p + V o ) were estimated with Patlak plots of AIF‐I, hypothetical AIFs, and cohort‐averaged AIFs and tissue Δ R 1 data. For the regions of interest, the K i s estimated with AIF‐I were slightly but not significantly higher than those obtained with hypothetical AIFs and cohort‐averaged AIF. In contrast, V p + V o was significantly higher when calculated with AIF‐I. Similar estimates of K i and V p + V o were obtained with hypothetical AIFs and cohort‐averaged AIF. In summary, AIF‐I underestimated the reference AIF; this shortcoming had little effect on the K i calculated by Patlak plot but produced a significant overestimation of V p + V o . Magn Reson Med 63:1502–1509, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom