Premium
Sensitivity and specificity of univariate MRI analysis of experimentally degraded cartilage
Author(s) -
Lin PingChang,
Reiter David A.,
Spencer Richard G.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.22110
Subject(s) - collagenase , cartilage , univariate , cluster analysis , pattern recognition (psychology) , hierarchical clustering , linear discriminant analysis , sensitivity (control systems) , centroid , nuclear medicine , biomedical engineering , chemistry , mathematics , artificial intelligence , nuclear magnetic resonance , computer science , statistics , anatomy , medicine , multivariate statistics , physics , electronic engineering , engineering , enzyme
MRI is increasingly used to evaluate cartilage in tissue constructs, explants, and animal and patient studies. However, while mean values of MR parameters, including T 1 , T 2 , magnetization transfer rate k m , apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and the dGEMRIC‐derived fixed charge density, correlate with tissue status, the ability to classify tissue according to these parameters has not been explored. Therefore, the sensitivity and specificity with which each of these parameters was able to distinguish between normal and trypsin‐degraded, and between normal and collagenase‐degraded, cartilage explants were determined. Initial analysis was performed using a training set to determine simple group means to which parameters obtained from a validation set were compared. T 1 and apparent diffusion coefficient showed the greatest ability to discriminate between normal and degraded cartilage. Further analysis with k ‐means clustering, which eliminates the need for a priori identification of sample status, generally performed comparably. Use of fuzzy c‐means (FCM) clustering to define centroids likewise did not result in improvement in discrimination. Finally, an FCM clustering approach in which validation samples were assigned in a probabilistic fashion to control and degraded groups was implemented, reflecting the range of tissue characteristics seen with cartilage degradation. Magn Reson Med, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.