z-logo
Premium
Linear least‐squares method for unbiased estimation of T 1 from SPGR signals
Author(s) -
Chang LinChing,
Koay Cheng Guan,
Basser Peter J.,
Pierpaoli Carlo
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.21669
Subject(s) - weighting , nonlinear system , flip angle , algorithm , monte carlo method , noise (video) , mathematics , linear model , linear regression , least squares function approximation , accuracy and precision , statistics , function (biology) , computer science , physics , artificial intelligence , magnetic resonance imaging , image (mathematics) , medicine , quantum mechanics , acoustics , radiology , evolutionary biology , biology , estimator
The longitudinal relaxation time, T 1 , can be estimated from two or more spoiled gradient recalled echo images (SPGR) acquired with different flip angles and/or repetition times (TRs). The function relating signal intensity to flip angle and TR is nonlinear; however, a linear form proposed 30 years ago is currently widely used. Here we show that this linear method provides T 1 estimates that have similar precision but lower accuracy than those obtained with a nonlinear method. We also show that T 1 estimated by the linear method is biased due to improper accounting for noise in the fitting. This bias can be significant for clinical SPGR images; for example, T 1 estimated in brain tissue (800 ms < T 1 < 1600 ms) can be overestimated by 10% to 20%. We propose a weighting scheme that correctly accounts for the noise contribution in the fitting procedure. Monte Carlo simulations of SPGR experiments are used to evaluate the accuracy of the estimated T 1 from the widely‐used linear, the proposed weighted‐uncertainty linear, and the nonlinear methods. We show that the linear method with weighted uncertainties reduces the bias of the linear method, providing T 1 estimates comparable in precision and accuracy to those of the nonlinear method while reducing computation time significantly. Magn Reson Med 60:496–501, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom