Premium
Statistical framework and noise sensitivity of the amplitude radial correlation contrast method
Author(s) -
Kipervaser Zeev Gideon,
Pelled Galit,
Goelman Gadi
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.21278
Subject(s) - voxel , cutoff , amplitude , pixel , noise (video) , physics , contrast (vision) , coherence (philosophical gambling strategy) , correlation , false positive paradox , mathematics , pattern recognition (psychology) , artificial intelligence , statistics , computer science , optics , image (mathematics) , geometry , quantum mechanics
A statistical framework for the amplitude radial correlation contrast (RCC) method, which integrates a conventional pixel threshold approach with cluster‐size statistics, is presented. The RCC method uses functional MRI (fMRI) data to group neighboring voxels in terms of their degree of temporal cross correlation and compares coherences in different brain states (e.g., stimulation OFF vs. ON). By defining the RCC correlation map as the difference between two RCC images, the map distribution of two OFF states is shown to be normal, enabling the definition of the pixel cutoff. The empirical cluster‐size null distribution obtained after the application of the pixel cutoff is used to define a cluster‐size cutoff that allows 5% false positives. Assuming that the fMRI signal equals the task‐induced response plus noise, an analytical expression of amplitude‐RCC dependency on noise is obtained and used to define the pixel threshold. In vivo and ex vivo data obtained during rat forepaw electric stimulation are used to fine‐tune this threshold. Calculating the spatial coherences within in vivo and ex vivo images shows enhanced coherence in the in vivo data, but no dependency on the anesthesia method, magnetic field strength, or depth of anesthesia, strengthening the generality of the proposed cutoffs. Magn Reson Med 58:554–561, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.