z-logo
Premium
Quantification of the pulse wave velocity of the descending aorta using axial velocity profiles from phase‐contrast magnetic resonance imaging
Author(s) -
Yu HsiYu,
Peng HsuHsia,
Wang JawLin,
Wen ChihYung,
Tseng WenYih Isaac
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.21034
Subject(s) - pulse wave velocity , descending aorta , cardiology , aorta , medicine , magnetic resonance imaging , blood flow , pulse (music) , coronary artery disease , nuclear magnetic resonance , blood pressure , radiology , physics , detector , optics
Abstract The pulse wave velocity (PWV) of aortic blood flow is considered a surrogate for aortic compliance. A new method using phase‐contrast (PC)‐MRI is presented whereby the spatial and temporal profiles of axial velocity along the descending aorta can be analyzed. Seventeen young healthy volunteers (the YH group), six older healthy volunteers (the OH group), and six patients with coronary artery disease (the CAD group) were studied. PC‐MRI covering the whole descending aorta was acquired, with velocity gradients encoding the in‐plane velocity. From the corrected axial flow velocity profiles, PWV was determined from the slope of an intersecting line between the presystolic and early systolic phases. Furthermore, the aortic elastic modulus (Ep) was derived from the ratio of the brachial pulse pressure to the strain of the aortic diameter. The PWV increased from YH to OH to CAD (541 ± 94, 808 ± 184, 1121 ± 218 cm/s, respectively; P = 0.015 between YH and OH; P = 0.023 between OH and CAD). There was a high correlation between PWV and Ep (r = 0.861, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that age and CAD were independent risk factors for an increase in the PWV. Compared to existing methods, our method requires fewer assumptions and provides a more intuitive and objective way to estimate the PWV. Magn Reson Med, 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here