z-logo
Premium
On restoring motion‐induced signal loss in single‐voxel magnetic resonance spectra
Author(s) -
Gabr Refaat E.,
Sathyanarayana Shashank,
Schär Michael,
Weiss Robert G.,
Bottomley Paul A.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.21015
Subject(s) - sinc function , dephasing , nuclear magnetic resonance , physics , signal averaging , signal (programming language) , phase (matter) , signal to noise ratio (imaging) , voxel , computational physics , mathematics , optics , computer science , mathematical analysis , artificial intelligence , transmission (telecommunications) , telecommunications , quantum mechanics , signal transfer function , analog signal , programming language
Destructive interference from phase fluctuations caused by motion during 1 H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) stimulated‐echo acquisition mode (STEAM) and point‐resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) acquisitions can significantly diminish the traditional √ N ‐gain in signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) afforded by averaging N signals, especially in the torso. The SNR loss is highly variable among individuals, even when identical acquisition protocols are used. This paper presents a theory for the SNR loss, assuming that the phase fluctuates randomly. It is shown that SNR in conventional averaging is reduced by the factor sinc(σ ϕ √3/π), where σ ϕ is the standard deviation (SD) of the phase. “Constructive averaging,” whereby each individual acquisition is phase‐corrected using the phase of a high‐SNR peak before averaging, reverses the SNR loss from motion‐induced dephasing, resulting in a {1/sinc(σ ϕ √3/π)}‐fold SNR improvement. It is also shown that basing phase corrections on an average of √ N adjacent points both improves correction accuracy and effectively eliminates false signal artifacts when corrections are based on low‐SNR peaks. The theory is validated over a sevenfold range of variation in signal loss due to motion observed in 1 H STEAM and PRESS data acquired from 17 human subjects (heart: N = 16; leg: N = 1). Constructive averaging should be incorporated as a routine tool for in vivo 1 H MRS. Magn Reson Med, 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom