Premium
On restoring motion‐induced signal loss in single‐voxel magnetic resonance spectra
Author(s) -
Gabr Refaat E.,
Sathyanarayana Shashank,
Schär Michael,
Weiss Robert G.,
Bottomley Paul A.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.21015
Subject(s) - sinc function , dephasing , nuclear magnetic resonance , physics , signal averaging , signal (programming language) , phase (matter) , signal to noise ratio (imaging) , voxel , computational physics , mathematics , optics , computer science , mathematical analysis , artificial intelligence , transmission (telecommunications) , telecommunications , quantum mechanics , signal transfer function , analog signal , programming language
Destructive interference from phase fluctuations caused by motion during 1 H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) stimulated‐echo acquisition mode (STEAM) and point‐resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) acquisitions can significantly diminish the traditional √ N ‐gain in signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) afforded by averaging N signals, especially in the torso. The SNR loss is highly variable among individuals, even when identical acquisition protocols are used. This paper presents a theory for the SNR loss, assuming that the phase fluctuates randomly. It is shown that SNR in conventional averaging is reduced by the factor sinc(σ ϕ √3/π), where σ ϕ is the standard deviation (SD) of the phase. “Constructive averaging,” whereby each individual acquisition is phase‐corrected using the phase of a high‐SNR peak before averaging, reverses the SNR loss from motion‐induced dephasing, resulting in a {1/sinc(σ ϕ √3/π)}‐fold SNR improvement. It is also shown that basing phase corrections on an average of √ N adjacent points both improves correction accuracy and effectively eliminates false signal artifacts when corrections are based on low‐SNR peaks. The theory is validated over a sevenfold range of variation in signal loss due to motion observed in 1 H STEAM and PRESS data acquired from 17 human subjects (heart: N = 16; leg: N = 1). Constructive averaging should be incorporated as a routine tool for in vivo 1 H MRS. Magn Reson Med, 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.