z-logo
Premium
Noninvasive measurement of myocardial tissue volume change during systolic contraction and diastolic relaxation in the canine left ventricle
Author(s) -
Rodriguez Ignacio,
Ennis Daniel B.,
Wen Han
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.20786
Subject(s) - ventricle , systole , diastole , cardiac cycle , cardiology , pulsatile flow , end systolic volume , medicine , isovolumetric contraction , perfusion , heartbeat , contraction (grammar) , stroke volume , blood pressure , heart rate , computer security , computer science
In coronary circulation the flow in epicardial arteries and veins is observed to be pulsatile and out of phase with each other. Theoretical considerations predict that this phenomenon extends to all levels of the vascular tree and leads to a cyclic fluctuation of regional tissue volume. Intramyocardial tissue volume change between end‐systole and end‐diastole was measured noninvasively with MRI in 10 closed‐chest beagles. The displacement encoding with stimulated‐echo technique was used to obtain pixel‐by‐pixel tissue displacement field between end‐diastole and end‐systole and vice versa in the midlevel left ventricle, from which the 3D strain matrix and volume changes were calculated. The volume change was between 0.8 ± 0.5% (mean ± STD) in the epicardial layer and 1.5 ± 0.6% in the subendocardial layer of the left ventricle. Tissue volume fluctuation reflects the amount of arterial inflow in a heartbeat under the assumption that regional arterial inflow and venous outflow have little time overlap. The corresponding perfusion level was estimated to be from (1.0 ± 0.6) ml/min/g in the epicardial layer to (1.7 ± 0.6) ml/min/g in the subendocardial layer, in good agreement with microsphere measurements in the same dog model. The result supports the notion of high arterial resistance at the microvascular level from intramyocardial pressure during systole. Magn Reson Med, 2006. Published 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here